Recent
Engineered “Cool Down” Is Short Lived
The temperature map below shows degrees “ABOVE NORMAL” for this Saturday. Almost the entire country is above normal , much of it 15 and even 20 degrees ABOVE NORMAL. Of course on any given day the climate engineers can change predictions, plans, alter forecasts and the reality on the ground, so any forecast maps are subject to change.
Tornado Stopped In It’s Tracks!
These weather tracking radar installations in reality work together with HAARP to direct weather patterns.
Delta Copycat
I follow the “weather patterns” and study what they are doing before they get to you as they move east from the west coast. The Coachella Valley and Palm Springs airport is a large Geoengineering base, I know this for a fact. They built a new control tower with Obama stimulus money and moved in all new control tower people a few months ago.
Helping The Geoengineers To Sell Geoengineering – Updated Jan 4 2014.
When alternative news sites and their followers jump up and down about “global cooling”, the geoengineers must be opening bottles of champaign to celebrate their success and the efforts of their newly recruited “sales staff”, many of whom are actually anti-geoengineering activists.To push conclusions of “global cooling” because of one very spun data set, without knowing or understanding the true picture or taking into account the effect of ongoing geoengineering on the climate, is to help the geoengineers sell their trade to politicians and leaders around the globe.
3 Examples of Chemtrail Fallout
These three videos show examples of the peculiar webs that are being seen falling from the sky after heavy spraying.
Climate Engineering and Weather Warfare, An Unfolding Catastrophe
There is literally no “natural” weather at this point, none.
2014: The Year of Commitment
Happy New Year to America and to people all over the world. However, happiness is hard to find in an economically devastated and war-entrenched planet, and one that is so profoundly damaged by non-stop radiation and geoengineering/aerial spraying.
Recent Vivid Sunsets/ Sunrises — What is Causing Them?
Over the last month we’ve seen amazing sunsets and sunrises all over the world, but especially in the US. Here in Oregon, we’ve had ‘popsicle’ orange sunsets that are spectacular. But the beauty underlies what I believe is something terrifying. The addition of new substances, more drastic chemicals, to the chem spray mixes.
Watch the Left Hand: Fukushima may be the Right
Something is far beyond contaminated and glow-fishy about the Fukushima meltdown. For two years it has been discussed and swarming with expertise, but with no limiting or actual efforts to stop the radiological contaminants from being released into the Pacific and all other connected oceans, the largest food and oxygen sources on the planet. Yet, surfers are surfing, swimmers are swimming, children are playing on beaches, and restaurants all over the earth are eating Pacific fish and also contaminated Atlantic fish according to multiple reports.
Fox News reports on chemtrails
A news report from Fox31 reveals to the masses that chemtrails may be a reality, leaving it up to the viewer to decide.
Breaking News: Air Raids, Chemical Weapons Hit California
Since at least the 1990′s, chemical weapons have been used in a spray form against the American people from the air, on a more or less continuous basis. The attacks continue today. The planes are not the air force of some other country or terrorist organization.
Civilian Aircrafts Are Involved In Clandestine Geoengineering
Civilian Aircrafts Are Involved In Clandestine Geoengineering.
It’s a fact: in the operations of clandestine and illegal geoengineering are also involved civilian airlines (mostly engaged in spraying during tje day) and oil companies. Edward Teller few decades ago suggested to use commercial airplanes to spread nanoparticles into the atmosphere officially in order to block the sunlight and cool the planet. In fact, the infamous “scientist” believed that military planes were not sufficient for the task. His advice was unfortunately followed. Teller believed that commercial aviation could be worked to spread these particles at a cost of 33 cents per liter (The patent Hughs of 1991 confirms that the particles can be spread by means of jet engines).
NASA goes public with aerosol effects on global climate but geoengineering is completely ignored.
Article disclaimer “NASA’S paid lairs acknowledge the atmosphere is full of aerosols, they acknowledge the effects of those aerosols on the climate, but as expected from time the power structure the major contributing source of the atmospheric aerosols, global geoengineering is completely ignored.”
Mystery Overhead
Area teacher raises questions about streaky-white, cloud-like formations in North State skies – By Evan Tuchinsky
Some North State residents are curious about the nature of certain streaky, white, cloud-like formations such as the perpendicular ones pictured at left, and “dripping” streaks like the one pictured below.
PHOTO BY PATRICIA KENYON
Geoengineering defined:
In Climate Change Science and Policy, Harvard scientist David W. Keith delineates geoengineering as “intentional, large-scale manipulation of the environment” in which “change must be the goal rather than a side effect.” Size and purpose separate geoengineering from other activities; Keith contrasts it with ornamental gardening (too small a scale) and pollution (a side effect, not an intended effect).
Have you ever looked up, or out on the horizon, and seen streaks of white across the sky? They have the cottony appearance of clouds, yet are too narrow and too symmetrical for a natural occurrence. They resemble contrails—streams of condensation following the flight paths of jet planes—but often appear in large numbers, and in lines that are perpendicular to each other.
Just what are those things, anyway?
Patricia Kenyon has been wondering the same thing, particularly for the past year and a half, ever since an engineer friend came to dinner and talked about chemtrails: that is, the aerial spraying of metallic particles designed to deflect solar radiation. Such a barrier could serve as a means for offsetting some of the warming effects of carbon-dioxide emissions.
Intrigued, and more mindful of the sky above her Tehama County home, Kenyon followed her friend’s lead. She discussed the topic with friends as well as fellow teachers at Bend Elementary School. She began researching an area of science known as geoengineering, which encompasses attempts to adjust natural conditions through systematic human endeavors, including aerial spraying.
She’s found plenty of material on the subject: documents, articles, photos and videos. Many are posted online by Geoengineering Watch, whose site (www.geoengineeringwatch.org) has logged more than 10 million visitors. The group’s lead researcher, North State resident Dane Wigington—a former employee of Bechtel Power Corporation—examines what he calls “weather modification on a global scale”—“the aerosol spraying from geongineering blocking some 20 percent of the sun or more, not to mention jet-stream manipulation … and artificially/ chemically nucleated snow storms.”
In a recorded presentation embedded on the home page, he says: “The dispute as to whether or not these programs are going on is really a moot point. We have more than enough data—we have actual footage—to show that tankers are indeed spraying at altitude. The materials we see showing up on the ground are the exact materials named in numerous geoengineering patents.”
Geoengineering Watch lists, and links to, more than 100 such patents. One (#5003186, to Hughes Aircraft), involves “a method for reduction of global warming” via “seeding of the atmosphere with metallic particles” such as “aluminum oxide.” The same site offers a MtShastaNews.com article that states, “Since May 2008, over 40 [rainwater] samples have been collected [in the Mount Shasta area], with the majority showing high levels of aluminum.”
Most compelling to Kenyon is what she and her husband, a veteran law-enforcement officer, have witnessed themselves. Using binoculars, they’ve seen white planes, with no identifying marks, spraying white trails above the North State.
“Through the last year, we have been watching on a regular basis how often the spraying has occurred, and it’s pretty regular in the North State—it’s probably every week, sometimes multiple times during the week—and it saturates the area for 24 hours or longer,” Kenyon said in a recent phone interview. “Only if we get a really strong wind does it dissipate.”
What exactly is in what she believes is a chemical spray, she does not know. Though she worked as a respiratory therapist before switching to elementary education 15 years ago, Kenyon is not a scientist.
Nor is she a conspiracy theorist with a pat explanation. She’s a curious 50-something—teacher, farmer, wife and mother—who values transparency. That’s why she’s been an activist for labeling foods that contain genetically modified organisms. It’s also why she just can’t overlook what she keeps seeing.
“There are more sinister ideas [about geoengineering] coming from some areas and people—which it could be,” Kenyon said in a recent phone interview. “The reality is we don’t know.
“The difference with this and GMOs is genetically modified organisms are something we can choose to purchase or not purchase; we can choose to grow them or not grow them. We can’t control what’s coming from above, and that’s frustrating.”
The concept of geoengineering is hardly new. In just one example, back in 1953, the Pacific Gas and Electric Company began seeding clouds to impact precipitation, including an experiment at Lake Almanor in the 1960s. (According to a 1969 article in the Journal of Applied Meteorology, PG&E put silver iodide in the air around the Almanor watershed and measured the effect on snow and rainfall.)
Climate Change Science and Policy, a textbook by the late author Stephen Schneider—an environmental-studies heavyweight who, among other things, was co-director at the Center for Environment Science and Policy of Stanford University’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies—says the Johnson administration in 1965 considered “suggestions that climate control using aerosols be used to offset the effects of rising CO2 concentrations,” and in 1992 the U.S. National Academy of Sciences analyzed “the cost of injecting aerosols into the stratosphere.”
According to the book, the NAS put the minimum price-tag at $100 billion a year for a 1 percent reduction in solar radiation in the lower atmosphere; “[w]hile this cost may sound high, it is roughly a factor of 10 lower than the cost to achieve an equivalent reduction in climate change through reductions in CO2 emissions.”
In other words, it’s cheaper to deflect sunlight than to change carbon-fuel consumption.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessed solar radiation management in its well-publicized 2013 report. Its determination: “If SRM were terminated for any reason, there is high confidence that global surface temperatures would rise very rapidly” with an acknowledgement that “SRM methods carry side effects and long-term consequences on a global scale.”
One of those side effects/consequences could be decreased rainfall, as has occurred in the North State (see “A dry spell,” Newslines, Nov. 21). The National Center for Atmospheric Research, in an article titled “Geoengineering the Climate Could Reduce Vital Rains,” predicts a 4.5 percent decrease in average precipitation worldwide, yet “monsoonal rains” in specific regions.
In “Chemtrails: A Planetary Catastrophe Created by Geoengineering,” the Center for Research on Globalization makes a strong case that geoengineering is not just theoretical science. It displays chemtrail photos from around the world, breaks down the chemical composition of sprays and assesses impacts.
Yet, relative to other environmental issues, geoengineering receives little attention.
“If this is happening because global warming is that big a concern, then we need to be making changes,” Kenyon said. “We need a conversation and we need answers, but the questions aren’t being asked [in a public forum, locally].”
Story by Evan Tuchinsky.
http://www.newsreview.com
Chemtrails? Watch This! Then Try to Deny It
This is an excellent video to help raise awareness of geoengineering
Chemtrails – How They Changed My World
Soon I will be turning 60, and I cannot help but recall my mother’s words when she told me she felt as if she had outlived her understanding of how the world worked. She was in her eighties when she explained this sadness, and I felt this must surely be a common feeling in eldership, and I felt deeply sorry for her. Little did I know that I would feel much the same at sixty.
US Navy predicts summer ice free Arctic by 2016
Chemtrails: The BIGGEST Coverup of All Time
MASSIVE Government Conspiracy Deceives The Whole Human Race
Geoengineered Snowstorms – THE SNOWMEN Turning Warmth Into Winter Part 2
by William Thomas The anticipated Big Blow came unexpectedly in late October 2012, when a late-season tropical storm picked up enough energy from an unusually warm Atlantic Ocean to maintain hurricane intensity as it tracked north. Blocked from recurving eastwards by the Greenland High, Sandy “did something never observed before in records going back to 1851 – it took a sharp turn to the west and headed toward the most populated area along the eastern seaboard,” scientists said. Invigorated by cold air deflected south from the Arctic, Sandy morphed into “a monster hybrid storm” with “the lowest atmospheric pressures ever recorded” for any storm making landfall north of Cape Hatteras. Instead of snow, Sandy unleashed rain of monsoon intensity.
Geoengineered Snowstorms – THE SNOWMEN Turning Warmth Into Winter Part 1
By William Thomas Screenheads clicking into Hollywood’s upcoming distractions can anticipate some improbable sci-fi antics this summer. But make believe can’t come close to what’s happening right over their bowed heads. It’s called “Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering” and it means exactly what you’d rather not ask.
ABC Completely Omits Climate Engineering Facts
When I agreed to do an interview about geoengineering with ABC weatherman Chris Edwards (former military meteorologist), I was fully expecting a disinformation “hit piece”. My decision to press on with the interview was because I felt that such obvious spin and coverup would clearly expose the agenda of ABC and Mr. Edwards to quell ever increasing public awareness of global climate engineering. (geoengineering)
Was there a complete lack of journalistic integrity in the interview linked below? I will leave that up to the reader to decide.
